by Katie Flood
Prior to my arrival in Chicago, I
was hesitant to move to Pilsen because I was afraid that it would be sketchy. I
grew up in the suburbs surrounded by perfectly landscaped yards and paved roads
that are repaired frequently. Everything always looks nice, AKA, not sketchy.
But since my arrival in Chicago my idea of “sketchy” has changed significantly.
While there are parts of my neighborhood that aren’t glamorous, I feel safe and
welcomed in these spaces. This doesn’t mean that I’m not cautious, but it
really has made me question why and how we categorize things as sketchy.
Merriam
Webster Dictionary defines “sketchy” in three ways:
1.
“not complete or clear”
2.
“done quickly without many details”
3.
“likely to be bad or dangerous”
I think that a lot of times we
focus too much on the third definition. We see a building and define it as
sketchy based on its appearance, which is not incorrect by the first two
portions of the definition, but then we automatically assume that because it
wasn’t well made or is missing parts of it, that it is a place of danger.
I
know that this is the mindset that I take when I look at things, but I also see
myself working my way out of that mindset through my exposure to parts of the
city that are automatically deemed as sketchy and therefore are unapproachable.
I think that when coming to Chicago it is important to focus on the assets that
each community has, rather than defining them by the problems the community
faces.
Being
a part of the Urban Intensive Track during my time in Chicago has given me the
opportunity to expand my horizons and learn to appreciate the beauty of various
neighborhoods throughout the city.


On a completely different note, make
sure you bring an umbrella!